Pascal's wager pascal concedes that a belief in god's existence cannot be supported by argument or evidence, but maintains that religious belief is. I see a lot of christians using pascals wager here bu ti ask them this, wht if you are wrong and islam is right or perhaps judaism or maybe even the druidic or egyptian religions from 2000+ years ago. Pascal's wager has 158 ratings and 24 reviews amanda said: is faith only blind belief, or are there quantifiable reasons to accept it, to consider the p. Pascal’s wager pascal’s wager is an attempt to justify belief in god not with an appeal to evidence for his existence but rather with an appeal to self-interest it is in our interests to believe in the god of christianity, the argument suggests, and it is therefore rational for us to do so. Pascal's wager the experiment 157 likes pascals wager the experiment is an event planning/marketing company that is based on the philosophical argument. Atheists get asked about this a lot, so i wanted to ask it from a different position so judgement day arrives for you, you see a light and follow it. The famous “pascal’s wager” asks us to consider the question of the existence of god as a wager which is the better bet—belief or disbelief.
Reconstruct pascal's wager as carefully as possible pascal does not think that the atheist or the believer would be convinced by his wager instead, he directs the wager to the curious and unconvinced i have a choice: either first i believe god exists or second i do not believe god exists. Pascal's wager claims that the penalty for not believing in god is worse than the penalty of believing in god incorrectly is this really true of biblical christianity. Pascal's wager is an argument that asserts that one should believe in god, even if god's existence cannot be proved or disproved through reason blaise pascal's original wager was as a fairly short paragraph in pensées amongst several other notes that could be considered wagers. Pascal's wager is an argument in philosophy devised by the seventeenth-century french philosopher, mathematician and physicist blaise pascal (1623–62) it posits that humans bet with their lives that god either exists or does not. Pascal's wager is the french philosopher blaise pascal's application of decision theory to the belief in god it is also occasionally known as pascal's gambit it appears in the pensées, a posthumous collection of pascal's notes for an unfinished treatise on christian apologetics. Pascal’s famous wager requires a choice between believing and not believing in god but there’s more than one way not to believe.
Let’s start with pascal’s original wager, on how to bet on the existence of god note that under the rules of pascal’s wager, you have to place your bet on whether god exists now, before you actually know. Blaise pascal's famous wager was that even if the existence of god cannot be determined through reason, a rational person should wager as though god exists, because living life accordingly has ever. Define pascal's wager pascal's wager synonyms, pascal's wager pronunciation, pascal's wager translation, english dictionary definition of pascal's wager. Pascal’s wager is an argument for the existence of god developed by 17th century mathematician and philosopher blaise pascal pascal’s wager is the most famous part of his collection of notes known as the pensées.
Background the life of the great mathematician, physicist and religious philosopher blaise pascal (1623-1662) is interesting and full of paradoxes. Pascal's wager was devised by 17th century french philosopher, mathematician and physicist blaise pascal (1623-1662) it posits that humans all bet with their lives either that god exists or not in the investment world, we think investors are betting with their life savings that central bankers are either gods or not. Pascal's wager in the seventeenth century the mathematician blaise pascal formulated his infamous pragmatic argument for belief in god in. Blaise pascal was a philosopher and mathematician in the 17th century pascal's wager, in a nutshell, is this: no one knows for certain whether god exists maybe he does, maybe he doesn't.
“pascal's wager” is the name given to an argument due to blaise pascal for believing, or for at least taking steps to believe, in god. Most people are familiar with pascals' wager (if you aren't, i've written about it here and here) pascal's basic idea was that it makes sense to believe in god, because if you're right the benefits are eternal and unlimited, while. Pascal's wager was originally put forth by blaise pascal, a 17th century philosopher and mathematician according to the wager, god may or may not exist if god does exist and you choose to believe in god, then your reward is.
Pascal's wager is a suggestion posed by the french philosopher, mathematician, and physicist blaise pascal that even if the existence of god could not be determined through reason, a rational person should wager as. Most philosophers think pascal's wager is the weakest of all arguments for believing in the existence of god pascal thought it was the strongest after finishing the argument in his pensées, he wrote, this is conclusive, and if men are capable of any truth, this is. I’ve been assailed lately with questions about my beliefs and then i’ve been assailed for my beliefs my recent essay on the topic brought more questions than understanding, and most of the questions were personal and stupid some readers imposed their ridiculous worldviews onto me in telling. Thinking about pascal’s wager helps us clarify our relationship with god the wager is not simple in its true complexity, it is a wise and sobering challenge but in its popular simplicity, it becomes misleading. Explain that pascal's wager doesn't prove god exists, it proves that it is better to believe, whether there is a god or not pascal's wager merely proves it is better to believe in god, just in case, but it explains nothing about god's existence. In defence of pascal’s wager pascal’s wager in this article i consider the many god’s objection to pascal’s wager this objects to “transfinite” versions of the wager that is, to say, it is an objection to versions of the wager that argue that it’s always decision theoretically rational to wager that god exists.